Getting eye level with our subjects has the power to do far more for our photographs than just create a connection with our viewers. From this angle of view, it allows us to simplify the composition, work with distant and out-of-focus backgrounds, and subtly brings in foregrounds to the equation.

How we position our camera in relation to our subjects has a tremendous impact on the way that viewers experience those subjects. While we are always cautious to suggest that any sort of "rules" apply to art and compositions, there is a default position we should always start with for photographing wildlife for one very important reason: its ability to create a connection with the viewer.

From the beginning of this series on the Art of Composition, we got bogged down in discussion about depth of field. This isn’t a topic that is typically brought into the conversations about composition. Yet, I have a difficult time thinking of a better place to begin. The ability to understand how we emphasize or deemphasize all the stuff in our composition means everything. And from the previous articles, you should understand that there is so much more that goes into depth of field, and bokeh, than just f/stops.

But now it’s time to move on. 

Large apertures and a shallow depth of field does more than just help us emphasize or deemphasize certain parts of the composition; in wildlife photography it emulates the way in which we respond to the very same situation in real life. Extremely shallow depths of field mirror both the physiological and psychological responses that humans have evolved for survival. Understanding this can revolutionize our photography.

Should I stick a teleconverter on my lens or just crop in Lightroom? This is a question we all face in the field at some time or another. Both are potential solutions for “getting closer.” Both come with their drawbacks. However, only one will improve your composition by creating additional bokeh and shallower depths of field.

When it comes to the sensors in our cameras, size matters. Full frame versus APS-C versus micro four thirds, each of these sensors have their benefits for different types of photography. But each also have an impact on depth of field and bokeh in our composition.

While depth of field is primarily a function of distance, the focal length of your lens also has a large impact on this as well. A 600mm f/4 lens has a shallower depth of field than a 400mm f/2.8, for instance. Depth of field, and thus the quality of bokeh, in our photographs is the accumulation of a variety of factors that have nothing to do with apertures and f/stops.

Above all else, distance is plays the biggest role in determining depth of field. Distance from your lens to the subject and distance from your subject to the background. Understanding this will allow you to create compositions with subjects that seem to leap right out of the photograph with any lens regardless of maximum aperture.

To create art, we must be able to control in order to express our creativity. With wildlife photography, however, there is very little we have control over. Unlike a studio photographer, we don't manipulate the light, backgrounds, subjects, or any other component accept for our compositions. It's for this reason that composition is of the upmost importance in wildlife photography because it is here where we have the ability to make magic happen.